04 / Repair with robotic surgeryWhat you should know about robotic VVF repair
When the VVF is large or does not respond to conservative (non-surgical) approaches such as long-term urinary catheterisation, surgical reconstruction – that is, closure – is required. For fistulas caused by surgical injury, the success rate reported for open surgery is generally around 76–97%. Vesicovaginal fistula repair consists of completely removing the fibrotic fistula tract and closing the bladder and vaginal walls separately. Different surgical techniques are recommended depending on the cause, location and size of the fistula and on the surgeon's experience.
Although the vaginal approach is less traumatic for the patient (lower morbidity/side effects) than open abdominal repair (and is a more familiar method, especially for gynaecologists), the abdominal approach is generally preferred in the following situations:
- Large (>2 cm in diameter) or supratrigonal (above the bladder trigone) fistulas.
- Fistulas located very close to the ureteral orifices.
- Especially patients who have had failed or multiple complex transvaginal/transabdominal VVF repairs.
Regardless of all this, for robotic surgeons with advanced experience in reconstructive robotic surgery, repair with robotic surgery is the most effective method for reducing the morbidity of the abdominal approach.
Whatever the size of the fistula, whatever its cause, and even after previous failed repairs, robotic surgery in our experience is associated with a complete success rate, minimal surgical trauma and lower morbidity, and allows the patient to recover faster.